Which claim is best supported by integrating information from both passages?

The claim that scientific and technological advances have made food and medical services easily available but may have long-term adverse effects on the environment and human health is well-supported by integrating information from both passages. The passages likely address how advancements in technology have improved accessibility to food and healthcare, showcasing innovations like genetically modified organisms (GMOs), fertilizers, and medical technologies that enhance yield and treatment methods.

However, they also point to concerns regarding the sustainability of these practices, highlighting potential negative impacts on ecological systems and human health. This duality captures the essence of modern developments in both fields, illustrating the benefits while acknowledging the risks, making this claim the most comprehensive and reflective of the content provided in the passages.

In contrast, the other choices either make overly simplistic assertions about technology's impact or suggest a level of perfection and safety that is not typically claimed in discussions about the complex nature of food production and healthcare advancements.